Is there such a thing as visual argumentation, or the case of the hydrated tulip

Authors

  • Hédi Virág Csordás Budapesti Műszaki és Gazdaságtudományi Egyetem

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14232/kulonbseg.2016.16.1.206

Abstract

When studying the apparatus of argumentative technique, one can ask if methods of analyzing verbal communication can be extended to the analysis of visual content, too. One can argue that pictures contain statements just like sentences do, and if these statements are identified, their content can also be reconstructed. These visual contents can be analysed from two perspectives: argmentation-theory and rhetorics. The first part of the paper argues that the analysis of verbal content can be performed like the reconstruction of verbal texts: on the basis of informal logic. Also, I argue that visual contents not only complement the verbal but can also be the precondition of its understanding. The second part of the paper analyses a case study for visual argumentation: advertising. In many advertisements arguments rely of visual content that is often sanctioned by the Bureau of Economic Competition, as their analysis by the usual methods of argumentation-theory show. In sum, the paper identifies argumentative schemes of advertisements and highlights the role of visual contents in the process of persuasion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2016-02-08

How to Cite

Csordás, H. V. (2016). Is there such a thing as visual argumentation, or the case of the hydrated tulip. Különbség (Difference), 16(1). https://doi.org/10.14232/kulonbseg.2016.16.1.206

Issue

Section

Action, Autonomy, Responsability